Summary: (Taken from GoodReads) Fifteen years from now, a new virus sweeps the globe. 95% of those afflicted experience nothing worse than fever and headaches. Four percent suffer acute meningitis, creating the largest medical crisis in history. And one percent find themselves “locked in”—fully awake and aware, but unable to move or respond to stimulus.
One per cent doesn’t seem like a lot. But in the United States, that’s 1.7 million people “locked in”…including the President’s wife and daughter.
Spurred by grief and the sheer magnitude of the suffering, America undertakes a massive scientific initiative. Nothing can restore the ability to control their own bodies to the locked in. But then two new technologies emerge. One is a virtual-reality environment, “The Agora,” in which the locked-in can interact with other humans, both locked-in and not. The other is the discovery that a few rare individuals have brains that are receptive to being controlled by others, meaning that from time to time, those who are locked in can “ride” these people and use their bodies as if they were their own.
This skill is quickly regulated, licensed, bonded, and controlled. Nothing can go wrong. Certainly nobody would be tempted to misuse it, for murder, for political power, or worse….
Thoughts: Scalzi takes an absolutely fascinating concept with Lock In and takes in unexpected directions. Where the obvious way to tell this story would be to have it be from the perspective of someone who has recently found themselves locked in and is struggling to come to grips with it (though that would still have made a very interesting story), he chooses instead to tell a murder mystery through the eyes of Chris Shane, a man who has been locked in since the age of 2 after falling ill with Haden’s, and, being fortunate enough to be born to a very affluent family, is able to have his consciousness ride around in a top-of-the-line “threep”, a humanoid Personal Transport affectionately nicknamed after C-3PO (which should give you a general idea of what threeps look like). The story starts with Shane’s first day on the job as an FBI agent, and immediately launches characters and readers into some serious action and controversy as government cutbacks and anti-Haden sentiments get worse, people get killed, and a huge conspiracy starts to come to light.
Shane is an interesting character to ride on the shoulders of, providing good insight into how Hadens, as those who have been affected by the disease, tend to live. He may be rich and able to afford a new threep at the drop of a hat, but he still faces many similar limitations in his life that other, less fortunate Hadens do. His body must be kept safe, because even when he’s walking around in a robot shell, if his fleshy body dies, he will die. He faces discrimination from those who are ignorant and those who are deliberately malicious. He experiences the perceived benefits and drawbacks of being a Haden, from having a body that can, in many ways, withstand more than a human body, to the community of the Agora (a Haden-only network, akin to a mentally-accessed Internet), to the thought that unless his body is properly taken care of by someone he trusts, he is extremely vulnerable.
Understandably, there are strong ties to disability activism in Lock In, and the expected debate about which form of treatment and accommodation would be better. Is it better to help those who are locked in adjust to new bodies and how their new lives will work, ensuring that they can still be productive and happy members of society? Or is it better to try to reverse the effect of Haden’s and ‘unlock’ individuals so that they can have functioning bodies? Many of these arguments struck me as quite similar to things have heard Deaf people debate, and are often debated around and about Deaf people. On one hand, removing what society sees as a disability can have many advantages, or rather it takes away a disadvantage that comes from lack of accommodation. On the other hand, and as is demonstrated in Lock In, sometimes it’s not a matter of returning someone to a previous state, it’s actively forcing them to adjust to something new. Shane was locked in when he was 2, and barely remembers a time when he wasn’t locked in. Another character, Cassandra Bell, was born locked in, and so she grew up with the Agora as her primary means of social interaction, and without the limitations a body puts on a mind, learned quickly and was extremely intelligent. To unlock either of them would essentially be forcing them into a new situation that they can’t remove themselves from, taking away a sense of self and community, so that they can fit someone else’s idea of normal. It’s the typical all-or-nothing approach that many people have when dealing with disability, and Scalzi presents it in clear terms that make both sides of a complex and multi-layered issue easier to understand.
The book is largely a murder mystery/crime thriller packaged in a sci-fi wrapper, making it appealing to multiple large audiences without sacrificing good elements from either genre. They both work to complement each other extremely well, adding layers of diversity to what could have been interesting stories all on their own, but together they make something phenomenal. Just as it’s good to have stories about the brilliant scientist who discovers an alien race, or the daring commander of a fleet of space ships, so too is it good to have stories that are more relatable, showing how the future gets integrated into what we know of the world today. Lock In does just that. It’s not an unbelievable far-future with a larger-than-life cast. It’s set in the very near-future, where events have influenced how certain aspect of technology has developed, but society has stayed pretty much the same and so despite the main character being incredibly rich and able to afford things that most can’t even dream of, the whole thing feels so very relatable, and it’s easy to imagine living in such a future not too long from now.
I have to commend Scalzi for the way so much information is conveyed to the reader. You’ve got commentary on social activism and disability, a different level of technology than we’re used to now, and information about how big businesses work, as well as the usual amount of A-to-B-to-C explanations that usually accompany a good murder mystery, and it’s all presented believably, without pages upon pages of info-dumps and exposition. his was done primarily by having many of the characters be knowledgeable about their own fields and expertise, but not everyone knows everything, and so to bring the whole investigating team up to speed, things had to be explained by various characters. There were very few moments where I felt like things were being dumbed down a little too much for the reader’s sake rather than the characters’; on the whole, it was done with skill and style.
I cannot recommend this novel enough. It has wide genre appeal and a cast of believable and interesting characters and a plot that keeps you pushing for just one more chapter, no, really, I’ll stop reading after one more chapter, eh, maybe just one more after this… I had trouble putting it down. I just didn’t want to close the book and leave the world behind, even for half an hour. It’s compelling, it’s well-structured, and it has gorgeous commentary on numerous social issues that are relevent today. I don’t think I can heap enough praise on this brilliantly intelligent neurosci-fi novel. All I can do is close by saying that you will not be disappointed when you read Lock In. It’s the kind of book that doesn’t need my praise, not because Scalzi’s already such a huge name in science fiction or because greater people than me have given it such positive reviews already, but because it stands so well on its own, speaks with its own voice, and is deeply note-worthy whether I say it is or not.
(Also, if you’re looking for more in the same setting, there’s a novella available on Tor.com: Unlocked: An Oral History of Haden’s Syndrome.)
(Received for review from the publisher.)